Children in Need day

by , 5 months ago

Friday is Children in Need Day - a great charity. I was listening to the Chris Evans breakfast show on Radio 2 yesterday when he raised about half a million pounds for the charity. But am I alone in feeling that the way in which it was done was very unpleasant to listen to? It was an auction for a chance to drive the lastest Ferraris, meet famous drivers, lunch with celebs, have drinks with Chris at his home etc etc, and the top ten bidders were the winners. Bids were in the region of £60,000 each and I found it uncomfortable to think about these people, able to spend such huge amounts of money apparently at the drop of a hat in such difficult times.
I know that the money is going to charity, but their money allows these people to buy something that would not normally be available. The 'cause' seems to be a side issue. They could have given the money directly to the charity concerned.
Has anyone got views on this or am I alone in not liking this way of fund-raising?

Responses (6)

I suppose like lots of the famous and rich they want something for their money and it looks good too. Some of them have that much money they don't know how to spend it all and doing this makes it something they could never buy and if they are willing to give this enormous amount of money to a charitable cause I just think of all the children it will benefit and what a great difference it will make to their lives and the considerable pleasure it will bring to them. I can see where you are coming from too Sidesalad but I know some of them do give to charities too and wouldn't want to stop them contributing to this one.

by Sabre, 5 months ago

sounds good , i hope that the rich will be generous enough to pay more for that ! good luck !
anyway ,it can say that is a good idea !

by zutou, 5 months ago

I agree with Sabre.

Even if we might find the profligacy of the very rich a little distasteful, I'm just grateful that the money goes to help those children.

I wouldn't want to watch the event on TV, but I would quietly send my donation, and be happy that other people could send gifts thousands of times as big as mine. If this gives them a bit of publicity or satisfies some celebrity craving, so what?

by Feline123, 5 months ago

I do empathise with what you're saying here, Sidesalad, I always find these celebrity charity dinners distasteful, when people pay extortionate amounts for huge sumptuous dinners made by celebrity chefs with the proceeds going to help the starving!

by fruitcake, 5 months ago

I understand where you're coming from fruitcake, but do the ends not justify the means? You could argue that the whole Children in Need day is distasteful because entertainment is having to be provided in order to grab peoples' attention and make them donate? (I know I'm playing devil's advocate here but there are parallels).

by MrWallet, 5 months ago

That's exactly what I feel fruitcake

by Sidesalad, 5 months ago

Perhaps they do, MrWallet, but my personal feeling about the celeb dinners is that they're distasteful in their 'look at me, I'm rich, famous, and I'm being photographed stuffing my face to show the masses how generous I am too' sort of way.

I don't see the Children in Need Day the same way...yes, it's about grabbing the attention, but the attention is on the cause not on the celebrities.

by fruitcake, 5 months ago

I have to stress that I do not feel this way about Children in Need in general, it was this particular bit of fundraising that I found distasteful. Most of the events are a fun way of getting people to donate and it is great to see children getting involved and learning how to give their time and to make an effort for others worse off than themselves.

by Sidesalad, 5 months ago

I agree, Sidesalad, and I understood your (in my view, justifiable) criticism to be limited to that particular aspect of fund-raising, which was why I brought up the celebrity dinners.

by fruitcake, 5 months ago

I think I meant 'brought up THE SUBJECT of celebrity dinners'...oops! :-)

by fruitcake, 5 months ago

If you can afford it and in doing so gain some kudos and more importantly help a charity then let it happen.

These 'events' are given free by promoters and make huge sums of money for worthwhile causes. As an incentive to get these already wealthy people to part with their money then I see nothing distasteful about it. It is a basic marketing initiative - offer something that 'money can't buy' and sit back and watch the money roll in.

The UK public are a generous sort when appeals are made and should be rightly proud of their ability to dig deep in difficult times.

by Parchester, 5 months ago

What I do object to is the rich telling us to dig deep and to constantly delve into our bottomless pits.
But it's a practice that seems to work as this nation is widely known for it's benevolence.
Do you recall Bob Geldof shouting at us to "send us your f...ing money"? Again an eminently worthy cause but I personally didn't like his approach.
I do subscribe to a charity and hubby subscribes annually a days pay (as do most of the company he works for) to a central charitable fund and we leave it at that.

by LILLIE, 5 months ago

Thanks for your responses. It seems that in general you disagree with they way I feel about this particular part of the fundraising. Thinking about this further, I suppose that this very showy way of giving (or buying as it is actually) is counter to the way in which I was bought up to believe that charitable giving should be done, that is quietly and without looking for reward or thanks. Some people who have little money but who give a couple of pounds may be discouraged, but these are the very people who are acting in a truly charitable way.

by Sidesalad, 5 months ago

Exactly, Sidesalad, the 'widow's mite'... :-)

by fruitcake, 5 months ago

We like to give to the charities we think need the money and must say it is mostly animals such as R.S.P.C.A., Blue Cross, P.D.S.A. and R.S.P.B.
We have also just finished sponsoring a dog for the blind and have some beautiful photos of our "puppy". We shall probably do another next year which then lasts for 16 months. We are also buying cat and dog food every fortnight towards our donation for the R.S.P.C.A. and fill the Jeep up with all sorts for the dogs and cats who no one wants. This is our personal way of helping but also when it's a charity for children we shall like millions of others donate some tonight. We also pay a monthly donation to the hospital that has treated my husband and this is to help other people who need anything at the hospital. Anyone shaking a box gets a donation and every charity shop gets one too so I don't think we can do any more at the moment unless we win the lottery.

by Sabre, 5 months ago

Posts within the money.co.uk community represent the views, experiences and opinions of members only. They should not be taken as financial advice and should not be followed without further research.

Get our free money saving newsletter
Join over 480,000 other subscribers who grab our expert money tips, unmissable money guides & hottest bargains each week in our special email...

More Discussions for Other Money

Join Our Community

Get fast answers to your money questions, Expert insight, top tips & much more...