| Related: | Personal Finance•Insurance•Home Insurance |
Most Senior Police officers are predicting a cut to front line services as a result of the cuts announced in the Spending Review last week.
I don't even think these senior officers are being irresponsible or scaremongering. I genuinely believe that frontline services i.e. the number of police officers available to respond to an incident, will be cut.
The government has stated that these savings can be achieved through cutting backroom staff, buildings and motorised vehicles, and that frontline services will not be affected, however, no one in the know appears to agree with them!
With this in mind, one suspects that we will have a more lawless society and that this will manifest itself in an increase in crime especially burglaries.
The knock on effect of an increase in crime will be an increase in insurance premiums, which the cash strapped people of this country will be expected to find amongst all the other increases in day-to-day living costs and the reduction in state support.
Many will have to make a choice between insuring their possessions or channeling the money into other necessary outgoings!
No I don't think there will be an increase in insurance premiums due to cuts in Police budgets....now that is scaremongering. And whilst those senior officers might be predicting a cut in front line services (PCSO'S will undoubtedly be affected as a lot of the funding for them comes from local government) that is just not the case when it comes to Police Officers, and whilst they may want the public to believe this is what the cuts will mean, in reality there has not been enough front line Police Officers for many years. Lancashire Constabulary have to find 4% savings over the next 4 years, 16% in total. I think this is quite an achievable figure. Much of this will be saved on 'natural wastage' through retirement and other reasons. There has been a hold on recruitment for the last 2 years and this may well continue for the foreseeable future. Many of those senior officers are no doubt worried about their own positions as with any large organizations it is very top heavy at senior management level. If the figures are to be believed (certainly in Lancashire) there has been a reduction in recorded crime....I certainly hope that this is the opportunity the police service as a whole has been waiting for in order to bring a more streamlined efficient service to members of the public without reducing the number of front line Police Officers.
Only time will tell and I pray that a reduction in police manning ( and hence their evidence on the street ) doesn't automatically lead to an increase in lawlessness. Insurance rates obviously depend on claim rates and crime and claims did rise as a result of the government police cuts, would the government be classed as 'culpibly neglectful' in their duty of care. Interesting point! But there are other things that will also lead to an increase in crime and lawlessness ... and many of these the government may well cause ... such as lack of employment, job prospects, cuts in social benefits, poorer housing, lack of housing .... all things that may make people feel impoverished and turn to crime for vengeance or simple survival. The new government have stated that life is going to become as people have never known and I think they are right. Discomfort in every facet of our lives will creep in for all but the cherished few. I just hope that I am wrong!
I don't think so. When people think of making cuts to the police force the first thing that springs to mind is cutting the front-line officers, but this is unlikely to be the case. There are so many different areas to the police force that there are numerous areas that can be made more efficient. Yes we will likely see some cuts in front-line officers through natural wastage as mentioned by Frenchwoodgirl however I cannot see how this will suddenly create a lawless society leading to knock on affects. I am sure the government would soon reconsider if this were the case!
No, I don't think so. I suspect that a lot of the police budget goes on the masses of form-filling that has to be done to indicate whether various government targets have been reached. If this can be managed better then I see no reason for reducing front-line services. I'm sure that anyone joining the police does so to be at the front line, not to do paperwork in the office, so the sooner this is simplified the better. We should all do our best to be vigilent in our own neighbourhoods and to help the police by reporting anti-social behaviour rather than turning a blind eye.
Sadly our experience in our neighbourhood is it's the police who turn a blind eye to the reported anti-social behaviour. The constant vandelism, which the council or the police fail to challenge and prevent, means that the service charge of the leaseholders is increasing to help pay for the constant repainting, replacement or renovation of council property damaged. That is why I posed the question about an increase in insurance premiums.
I have to make a point that I do not believe it is either the police or the council who should be responsible for preventing vandalism. Yes the police should take robust action against the offenders if they are caught but unfortunately there is no way they can prevent it from happening in the first place. Surely that is the responsibility of the parents? I do feel that the police service on the whole is expected to fulfil too many roles that really should be controlled by other agencies. As it is they are are expected to do the jobs of parents, social workers and teachers to name a few when really what they should be concentrating on is what they are paid to do and that is POLICE. Sidesalad is right that there is far too much time spent on fulfilling targets set by the Government and that we all have a responsibility to do our bit for the neighbourhoods that we live in.
I agree with Sidesalad that we should help the police by reporting anti-social behaviour/vandalism etc, and with frenchwoodgirl that the police should take robust action against the offenders if caught, but I had an interesting experience regarding these two points last year. Forced to leave my car parked outside my house for ONE night only (it's always parked in the garage, but I had a newly delivered bathroom sitting in the garage overnight), I heard unusual noises about 2a.m. and looked out of my bedroom window to see 3 lads attacking my car. I phoned the police and reported it, telling them that I was actually watching the lads while reporting it. The police advised me not to tackle the lads as there were 3 of them and one of me, but then said that they couldn't send anyone round as they had no one available, but they could send me a 'Victim Support' form if I wanted one! I, and my car, live less than 25 yards from the police station!
I believe that any significant levels of police cuts in will dramatically lead to far greater levels of crime in the affected areas but not necessarily accompanied with similar % increases of insurance premiums.The insurance premiums are usually already factored.
Posts within the money.co.uk community represent the views, experiences and opinions of members only. They should not be taken as financial advice and should not be followed without further research.
Get fast answers to your money questions, Expert insight, top tips & much more...